Saturday, April 11, 2026

Tips Sebelum Nak Resign, TOLONG BACA NI DULU!

SEBELUM NAK RESIGN TOLONG BACA NI!

Saya sekarang dah 41tahun, Degree in Aerospace Engineering dari USM. Saya mula kerja masa habis study tahun 2008. Ni yg saya buat setiap kali nak resign. 

Saya tengok ramai nak resign atas sebab tersendiri. Tapi jangan lah resign membabi buta. Tersilap langkah makan tahun nak dapat kerja baru.

So kat sini saya kongsikan macam mana saya mudah dapat kerja baru. Benda ni sangat penting untuk awak ada “extra point” berbanding candidate lain.

Semoga bermanfaat.

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

The Industrial Court has ordered a Hospitality firm to pay more than RM430,000 to a former senior employee

The Industrial Court has ordered a hospitality firm to pay more than RM430,000 to a former senior employee after ruling his resignation was a "forced dismissal" masked by a bad-faith Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) ⬇️

Here’s a clear bullet-point summary of the article:

๐Ÿงพ Key Facts:
1) The Industrial Court ordered a hospitality company to pay RM433,180 to a former employee.

2) The payment was due to a finding of unfair dismissal (without just cause or excuse).

⚖️ Court Findings:
1) The employer failed to justify the dismissal with sufficient evidence.

2) The court determined that the termination did not meet the legal threshold of misconduct or valid reason.

3) As per industrial relations principles, the burden of proof lies on the employer—which was not met. 

๐Ÿ’ฐ Compensation Breakdown:
- The awarded sum included:
1) Back wages

2) Compensation in lieu of reinstatement

Industrial Court remedies are designed to restore the employee’s financial position as if dismissal had not occurred.

Monday, March 16, 2026

Soalan Temuduga: “Kenapa berhenti kerja lama?”

Soalan Temuduga: “Kenapa berhenti kerja lama?”
Jawapan ini boleh menentukan sama ada anda diterima atau tidak.

Ramai orang tersilap di bahagian ini.
Kalau jawab terlalu ringkas, penemuduga mungkin salah faham.
Kalau cerita terlalu panjang pula, mudah tersalah cakap dan “tembak kaki sendiri”.

Ada satu prinsip mudah dalam dunia kerja:
Faham sesuatu, tetapi tidak perlu cerita semuanya.

Perkara paling penting ketika menjawab soalan ini ialah:
Jangan sekali-kali mengutuk syarikat lama.

Walaupun realitinya mungkin benar —
syarikat rugi, kerja banyak gaji rendah, bos susah, rakan sekerja bermasalah atau pengurusan kelam-kabut.

Kenapa?
Kerana masalah yang sama mungkin juga wujud di syarikat baru.
Jika anda terlalu banyak mengadu, penemuduga mungkin menganggap anda seorang yang suka menyalahkan orang lain dan sukar bekerjasama.

Jadi bagaimana cara menjawab dengan bijak?
Berikut beberapa situasi biasa dan contoh jawapan yang lebih profesional.

---

1️⃣ Jika diberhentikan kerana pengurangan pekerja

❌ Jawapan yang tidak sesuai
“Company buang pekerja, jadi saya kena berhenti.”

Jawapan seperti ini membuatkan orang fikir anda kurang prestasi.

✅ Jawapan yang lebih baik
“Saya telah bekerja di syarikat sebelumnya selama beberapa tahun dan banyak belajar di sana.
Namun kebelakangan ini industri tersebut mengalami penurunan dan syarikat terpaksa mengecilkan operasi.
Saya melihat ini sebagai peluang untuk mencari cabaran baharu dan berkembang bersama organisasi yang lebih stabil.”

---

2️⃣ Tekanan kerja tinggi dan selalu kerja lebih masa

❌ Jawapan yang tidak sesuai
“Setiap hari kena OT sampai malam tapi tak ada elaun.”

Ini kedengaran seperti sekadar mengeluh.

✅ Jawapan yang lebih baik
“Saya faham dalam mana-mana pekerjaan, kerja lebih masa kadang-kadang memang perlu untuk capai sasaran.
Namun saya lebih menghargai budaya kerja yang menitikberatkan kecekapan dan hasil.
Sebab itu saya berharap dapat menyertai organisasi yang fokus kepada produktiviti dan pencapaian.”

---

3️⃣ Tiada peluang kenaikan pangkat

❌ Jawapan yang tidak sesuai
“Tak ada masa depan di sana.”

Jawapan ini terlalu umum.

✅ Jawapan yang lebih baik
“Saya bersyukur dengan pengalaman yang saya peroleh di syarikat lama.
Tetapi saya juga percaya bahawa untuk terus berkembang dalam kerjaya, kita perlu mencari peluang baharu dan cabaran yang lebih besar.”

---

4️⃣ Ingin meningkatkan pendapatan

❌ Jawapan yang tidak sesuai
“Gaji terlalu rendah.”

Ini boleh memberi tanggapan negatif.

✅ Jawapan yang lebih baik
“Dalam tempoh bekerja sebelum ini, saya terlibat dalam beberapa projek dan berjaya mencapai beberapa hasil yang baik.
Kini saya berharap dapat menyumbang kemahiran tersebut di organisasi yang lebih besar serta berkembang dari segi tanggungjawab dan ganjaran.”

---

5️⃣ Tidak serasi dengan bos atau rakan sekerja

❌ Jawapan yang tidak sesuai
“Bos tak tahu urus syarikat.”

Ini sangat berisiko untuk disebut.

✅ Jawapan yang lebih baik
“Saya lebih selesa bekerja dalam organisasi yang mempunyai sistem pengurusan yang jelas serta komunikasi yang baik antara pasukan.
Persekitaran seperti ini membantu setiap orang memberi prestasi terbaik.”

---

Kesimpulannya:

Dalam temuduga kerja,
cara kita bercakap kadang-kadang lebih penting daripada apa yang kita ceritakan.

Elakkan mengadu.
Gunakan bahasa yang positif.
Tunjukkan bahawa anda mahu belajar, berkembang dan memberi nilai kepada syarikat.

Apabila majikan melihat sikap seperti ini,
peluang anda untuk diterima tentu lebih tinggi.

๐Ÿ’ฌ Pada pendapat anda, soalan temuduga yang paling susah dijawab ialah yang mana satu?

Sunday, March 15, 2026

What Happened When Veronika Got Rejected After Five Interviews

What Happened When Veronika Got Rejected After Five Interviews 


๐Ÿง‘‍๐Ÿฆฐ Hello? Hey, it's Lillian, the recruiter. 
๐Ÿง• Yeah, hi Lillian, what's up? 
๐Ÿง‘‍๐Ÿฆฐ Yeah, so I'm just calling to let you know that we did decide to go in a different direction. I just wanted to give you a heads up.
I
 didn't just want to email you. 
๐Ÿง• Okay, not a problem. So just be on the lookout for an email from me later today, okay? 
๐Ÿง‘‍๐Ÿฆฐ I feel like that's my line.
What am I receiving an email from you?
๐Ÿง• I'll be emailing you an invoice. 
๐Ÿง‘‍๐Ÿฆฐ An invoice for what exactly? 
๐Ÿง• Yeah, I had five interviews with you guys. You guys wasted about 10 hours of my time telling me that I was a top contender and basically assuring me that I had this job to only call me now and tell me last minute that you decided to go in a different direction.
So I will be submitting an invoice for the time that you guys wasted. 
๐Ÿง‘‍๐Ÿฆฐ This wasn't done maliciously. I mean... 
๐Ÿง• No, see what happens is that you guys sit there and you interview multiple people and you ask them questions and you figure out what they would do in certain situations and then you don't hire any of them and then you use their knowledge to handle issues that you may already be having and that is wholly unfair to people that are looking for a job.
So I will be submitting an invoice because even if it's not for my time,
 it's for the knowledge because the questions that you guys asked were very, very specific. So it goes to show that you guys have these issues within your company and you really wanted just some free consultations. So my consultations are not free.
I charge $400 an hour for my private
 consultations. So I will be submitting an invoice for the time that you wasted and all of the information that you got out of me and I hope that everyone else does the same. 
๐Ÿง‘‍๐Ÿฆฐ This is extremely rude and unprofessional.
๐Ÿง• I'm not worried about being professional with you at this time. You're not
 hiring me anyway, so I don't need to be professional with you and I'm actually being very respectful. I feel like this is an extreme measure.
Just know that you'll be receiving an
 invoice. Okay. Oh, all right.
๐Ÿง‘‍๐Ÿฆฐ All right. Bye. Bye.
๐Ÿง• Bye. Bye.

Friday, March 13, 2026

They call you SELFISH! That’s because they can’t benefit from you anymore

They call you selfish. That's because they can't benefit from you anymore. 

They say you're immature. It's because you don't obey them. 

They say you have a bad attitude. Because you won't bend to their will.

They call you stubborn. That's because you can't be controlled. 

They say you're difficult. Manipulation doesn't work on you. 

They say you're too sensitive. Because you saw through their intentions.

They say your attitude is the problem. That's because you have the facts. They say your vision is limited.

Because you didn't fall for their illusion. You can't control what people say. But don't ever punish yourself for their words.

Let them talk. You stay focused. Stop overthinking.

Build yourself. That's how you escape the traps hidden in other people's words.

Monday, March 9, 2026

How to Survive a Workplace Where Every Word Gets Weaponized

How to Survive a Workplace Where Every Word Gets Weaponized”.

๐Ÿ‘and ♻️ if this message resonates with you

#toxicworkplace #WorkplaceWellness #corporate #toxicboss #ha


Whenever sentence becomes a setup, stop offering them scripts.

In toxic cultures, they don't wait for mistakes. They try to twist everything you say so they can use it against you.

You try to be clear, helpful, and honest, but every time you're framed as the villain.

When you calmly express concerns, they say you're complaining. When you ask why, they get defensive. 

Here's what you have to understand. They don't want to understand you. They want something to use against you.

So stop trying to be perfectly understood. Instead, seek to understand. Understand their patterns, not just their words.

Understand that their accusations are reflections of their insecurities. (they maybe intimidated by your strength or try to make you look problematic so that the one that they want to promote is purposely  by thier design 

Understand that you're not dealing with logic, but manipulation. When you see clearly what they're doing, you regain control.

Not of them, but of yourself. You can't win a rigged game by playing harder. You win by changing how you play.

Learn how to do this by commenting detox, and I'll send you a link to my post, How to 
Survive a Workplace Where Every Word Gets Weaponized.

Chapter 7: The Linguistics of Self-Defense: Thriving in the Hostile Office

(For educational purposes.) 

You joined this company to build a career, collaborate on interesting problems, and earn a living. Instead, you feel like you’ve wandered onto a linguistic battlefield. In the breakroom, in emails, and especially in meetings, the air is thick with tension. A simple suggestion is later reframed as a complaint. A casual joke becomes evidence of insubordination. A request for clarification is filed away as proof of incompetence.

Welcome to the Weaponized Workplace. Here, information isn't shared to inform; it's shared to entrap. Words aren't used to communicate; they are used to control, deflect blame, and build empires on the ruins of others' reputations.

Surviving—and even thriving—here requires a specific skillset. It’s not about fighting fire with fire; that’s a quick way to get burned. It’s about building a personal firewall. This chapter is your guide to understanding the landscape, deploying defensive tactics, and protecting your most valuable asset: your sanity.

7.1 The Landscape: Recognizing the Pattern

The first step to survival is diagnosis. You cannot fight an enemy you refuse to see. Weaponization takes many forms, but it often follows predictable patterns. You might recognize a few of these archetypes in your office:

· The Paraphraser: This person listens to your words only to translate them into something incriminating. You say, "I'm concerned we might miss the deadline if we don't get the assets by Tuesday." They later report to the boss, "Sarah expressed serious doubts about the team's ability to complete the project on time."
· The Concern Troll: They express performative worry about you to undermine you. "I'm just so concerned that taking on this project will be too much for you, given your recent struggles with the last one." The "concern" is a vehicle for reminding everyone of a past failure.
· The Historian: This person has perfect recall for every minor mistake you've ever made. In a meeting about your current project, they’ll say, "Well, given the issues with the Q3 report, we should probably have someone double-check your work on this."
· The CC Bomber: They flood email chains with recipients, especially your boss and their boss, to create a public record that paints you in a negative light. A simple misunderstanding becomes a formal, documented accusation of your failure to communicate.

Recognizing these tactics is crucial because it depersonalizes the attack. It’s not about you being "too sensitive." It’s a strategy. And once you see the strategy, you can plan a counter-move.

7.2 The Art of the Impenetrable Statement

In a normal workplace, you can think out loud. You can say, "Hmm, I'm not sure how to approach this. Maybe we could try X?" In a weaponized workplace, that's a liability. Your primary defense is to make your communication as difficult to misrepresent as possible.

Rule 1: Starve the Paraphraser of Ambiguity.
Vague language is their oxygen. Words like "maybe," "I feel," "perhaps," and "I think" are weapons waiting to be turned on you. Replace them with concrete statements rooted in data and process.

· Instead of: "I feel like we're getting bogged down in the details."
· Try: "We've spent 40 minutes on Section 3.1. To meet our 2 p.m. adjournment goal, I recommend we table this section and capture the outstanding items as action points."

See the difference? The first is a feeling. The second is an observation of time spent, tied to a stated goal (adjournment), with a process-oriented solution.

Rule 2: Write to the Public Record, Not the Recipient.
Before you hit "send" on an email, imagine it printed out and read aloud in a company-wide meeting. Would it still sound reasonable and professional? The CC field is not just for collaborators; it's your audience. When in doubt, include your manager on sensitive emails, not to tattle, but to create a transparent record.

Rule 3: The Broken Record Technique.
When faced with a leading or accusatory question, don't take the bait. Calmly and repeatedly return to your core message.

· Them: "So, you're saying you refuse to help with the client presentation?"
· You: "No, I'm saying I can assist after I complete the data validation by 3 p.m., as it's the top priority in the project plan we all agreed to."

You are not being defensive. You are simply correcting the record and re-anchoring the conversation to the facts.

7.3 Strategic Alliances and Safe Harbors

You cannot survive this alone. Isolation makes you an easier target.

· Identify the Neutrals: Find the colleagues who are consistently professional and seem to fly under the radar of the office drama. Build genuine, low-key relationships with them. Grab coffee. Ask about their weekend. These are your reality checks—people who can confirm that, yes, that interaction was as weird as you thought it was.
· The "Can You Help Me Understand?" Gambit: When someone says something that feels like an attack in a group setting, use the Socratic method to turn the spotlight back on them. Do it with a genuine, puzzled expression.
  · Them: "Well, this wouldn't have happened if you'd followed the initial specifications."
  · You: "I want to make sure I'm learning from this. Can you help me understand which specific specification you believe was overlooked? I have the original doc here."
  This forces them to provide evidence on the spot, which they often cannot do. It makes their statement look vague and unfounded.

7.4 The Most Important Person to Protect

In the end, all the tactical communication in the world won't save you if you're hollowed out inside. The constant vigilance, the parsing of words, the emotional exhaustion—it takes a toll. This is the invisible wound of the weaponized workplace.

You must build a fortress around your self-worth that is completely independent of your job.

· Your Work is Not Your Identity: You are not the role listed in your email signature. You are a person with hobbies, relationships, passions, and values that exist wholly outside that building. Nurture them. When your job is just something you do rather than what you are, its chaos can't destroy you.
· Keep a "Brag File": This isn't for ego. It's for evidence. Privately and regularly document your wins—positive emails from clients, successful project completions, instances where you went above and beyond. In a place where words are weaponized, facts are your shield. This file is your ammunition for performance reviews or, if it comes to it, for defending yourself in a formal HR conversation.
· Know Your Exit Velocity: The ultimate survival strategy is knowing you have a way out. Update your resume. Maintain your professional network. Casually look at job postings. You don't have to be actively leaving, but you must have the power to leave. This knowledge alone—that you are there by choice, not by trap—is the most potent antidote to the anxiety of a hostile workplace.

Surviving a weaponized workplace isn't about winning their game. It's about refusing to play by their rules. It’s about becoming so clear, so professional, and so grounded in your own reality that their words lose their power to wound. You become an observer of the chaos, not a victim of it. And in that observation, you find your freedom.

Thursday, March 5, 2026

Lightning Round: 10 Corporate Truths That’ll Change How You Play the Game You all know me for my truth-telling

Lightning Round: 10 Corporate Truths That’ll Change How You Play the Game You all know me for my truth-telling — and I’m back with my next lightning round of 10 corporate truths you need to know. These are the unfiltered rules

You're doing everything right and still not getting promoted. It's not you, it's the system, and I'm here to decode it. 

I'm Deepali Vyas, your elite recruiter, 25 years behind the scenes of corporate America, placing executives, advising boards, and decoding the leadership game.

You
 all know me for my truth-telling, and I'm back with my lightning round of 10 corporate truths you need to know. You already know I don't sugarcoat, and I'm not here to scare you, I'm here to prepare you, so let's get into it. 

Truth number 1, if you are overqualified, they'll under-resource you.
That's not trust, it's sabotage wrapped in a compliment.
 

Truth number 2, high performers are punished with silence, not feedback, because if they acknowledge your impact, they owe you more power or more money.

Truth number 3, the meeting before the meeting is where the real decisions happen.
If you weren't in the pre-read or the pre-call, you were never in the running.

Truth number 4, they'll keep you essential just long enough to block your evolution. You're too valuable where you are, which means you'll never grow unless you push.

Truth number 5, gratitude is weaponized to keep you compliant. Be grateful becomes code for don't ask for more. 

Truth number 6, invisibility is rarely accidental, it's engineered.
No access, no exposure, no opportunity. Then they say you didn't raise
 your hand.

Truth number 7, they'll label your boundaries as attitude and your ambition as arrogance, especially if you don't play the part they've assigned to you.

Truth number 8,
 your impact doesn't speak for itself. It needs a translator with power, and if you don't have one, build it or become it. 

Truth number 9, corporate doesn't reward the best, it rewards the best at signaling.
Those who look the part often beat those who play the role.

And truth number 10, they'll keep you out of the strategy, then blame you for not being strategic. You weren't underperforming, you were under included.

If this felt like someone finally
 saying what you've lived, it's because I'm not here to coddle you, I'm here to give you strategy. Book a coaching session or attend one of my monthly webinars or sign up for my free newsletter where I'm rewriting the playbook on career literacy and exposing the corporate game. Both are in my bio.

Let's get you unstuck with precision because corporate will convince you
 that it's your turn to wait until you've waited your power away.

I'm Deepali Vyas, your elite recruiter, and my mission, to tell you what they want.

Communicate like a Boss. Stop Explaining. Start Leading

Communicate like a Boss. Stop Explaining. Start Leading. Most people weaken their message without even realizing it. They walk into a meeting, present their recommendation… and then immediately talk themselves out of their own

They tell you to communicate with confidence, but no one tells you the one habit that makes you sound uncertain, even when you're 100% right. You might wanna save this video. You're gonna need it for later.

I'm Deepali Vyas, your elite recruiter. Let me tell you about an executive I coached recently. Brilliant, sharp, boardroom caliber.

But every time she presented a recommendation, she would sabotage herself without even knowing it. Here's what she used to do. She'd walk into a room and say something like, I've decided we're going with this vendor and here's why.

But of course, here are a few things that could go wrong. Stop, right there. That's where she lost the room.

She thought she was being thorough. I've done my due diligence. I've thought of everything and I'm intellectually honest, but here's what actually happens.

The minute you present both sides of the argument, you give the room ammunition to doubt you. You give people who already hesitate a pathway to disagree. You hand your critics a script.
You open the door you should have kept closed. So I told her the same thing I'm going to tell you. In the boardroom, confidence is clarity, not disclaimers.

Leaders don't present both sides like a debate team. Leaders present a decision and the reasons it's right. Everyone already knows there are cons.

Every recommendation has risk, but that's not your job to weaken your position by listing them out. If someone wants to challenge you, let them bring it up. That's their job.

Your job is to communicate like an operator and not a reporter because that was her trap. She used to be a journalist and journalists write from both angles. Executives don't. Executives make a call and then stand on it. And once she removed, but here's the downside from her delivery, she suddenly sounded like the strongest voice in the room. And here's my corporate truth.

Your message doesn't lose power because you're wrong. It loses power because you over explain. If you want more scripts, power language and communication frameworks you can use immediately at work, comment elite and I'll send you my free weekly newsletter.

The place I teach you on how to communicate, lead and make decisions like a boss. I'm Deepali Vyas, your elite recruiter doing the research for you so you don't have to. And my mission, I tell you what they want.

They Hand You a Job Description but Never Show you the Rulebooks

They hand you a job description but never show you the rulebook

They hand you a job description but never show you the rulebook and still expect you to play the game perfectly. After 25 years of climbing the corporate ladder, I finally saw the truth they never wanted me to figure out. 

There are unspoken rules in corporate America and if you don't know them, you lose.

Rule number 1, your salary is based on how hard you are to replace, not how hard you work. 

Rule number 2, the meeting after the meeting is where the real decisions happen. If you're not invited to coffee after, you're not in the inner circle.

Rule number 3, never be the first to leave or the last to arrive. Optics matter more than output in most companies. 

Rule number 4, your boss's problems become your problems, but your problems, they stay yours.

Rule number 5, the person who asks the fewest questions in meetings is usually the most secure in their position. Rule number six, base time with executives is worth more than overtime with your direct reports. Corporate will hand you a playbook for compliance, but they never offer you the playbook for power.

That's the difference between surviving and winning in this corporate game. 

I'm Deepali Vyas, your elite recruiter, doing the research for you so you don't have to, and I tell you what they wont

Sunday, March 1, 2026

How to Handle Micromanaging Boss?

Semalam saya berborak dengan seorang hamba Allah ni. Saya tanya, "Pernah kena micromanage dengan bos tak?"

Dia senyum. Dia tak lari pergi menangis kat HR. Dia tak update status sedih kat media sosial. Dia guna taktik Malicious Compliance.
Bos nak tahu sangat semua benda? Dia micro-update bos dia balik setiap 5 minit:

"Bos, saya tengah taip perenggan kedua e-mel client."
"Bos, saya nak berjalan pergi tandas sekejap."
"Bos, saya dah masuk gear kereta nak pergi lunch.""Bos, saya tengah kemas meja nak punch out."

Result? Bos dia rimas, give up, dan terus tak berani minta update lagi. The micromanager choked on his own medicine.

The brutal corporate truth: Ramai pekerja bila berdepan dengan pengurus micromanager, dorang pilih untuk stress, burnout, dan meratapi nasib. Itu mindset mangsa.

Micromanagers operate on anxiety and a false sense of control. Mereka takut benda tak jalan kalau mereka tak tengok. Cara nak bunuh anxiety dorang?Suap update dan data setiap 5 minit sampai dorang lemas dan rimas. Biar dorang sedar betapa bodohnya proses tu.

Stop being a victim of bad leadership. Weaponize their own management style against them.

Don't just survive toxic bosses. Outsmart them.

Semoga bermanfaat, dan selamat beramal...๐Ÿ˜

Friday, February 27, 2026

Salary Negotiation - Level Up

During a job interview, if they ask: “What are your salary expectations?” 

THE GOLDEN RESPONSE:

“Based on my research and the value I’ll bring to this role, I’m looking for something in the range of [X to Y].

But I’m flexible depending on the full compensation package and growth opportunities.
What range did you have in mind?”

1. You Give a Range, Not a Single Number

Single number = anchor point they’ll negotiate DOWN from.
Range = shows you’ve done research, gives room to negotiate UP.

Example:
“I’m looking for $85,000”
“I’m looking for $85,000 to $95,000”

The range keeps you in control.


2. You Mention “Value You’ll Bring”

This reminds them you’re not just asking for money.
You’re trading skills and results for compensation.

It shifts the conversation from cost to investment.

3. You Say “I’m Flexible”

This shows you’re reasonable and open to discussion.

But you’re flexible on the PACKAGE, not desperate.

Benefits, bonuses, equity, remote work, all negotiable.

4. You Flip the Question Back

“What range did you have in mind?”
This forces them to show their cards first.

If their range is higher than yours?
You just got a raise.

If it’s lower?
You have data to counter with.

5. When They Push Back:

Them: “That’s higher than we budgeted.”

You:
“I understand. Based on [specific skill/experience], I believe I’ll deliver [specific result].
Is there flexibility in the budget for the right candidate?”

Always tie your ask to the value you provide.

6. If They Insist You Go First:

Use this script:

“I want to make sure we’re aligned before discussing numbers.
Can you share the range you’ve budgeted for this role?
That way I can tell you if we’re in the same ballpark.”

Most will share.
If they won’t, give your range.

7. The Research Part (Do this Before The Call):

Check Glassdoor, Levels. fyi, Payscale for the role.

Ask people in similar roles (LinkedIn DMs work)
Factor in: location, company size, your experience
Add 10–20% to the average = your range

Knowledge is leverage.

It’s still a good idea to negotiate salary in most cases.
Companies often expect candidates to counter and may have a buffer built into their budget.

A polite and well-researched negotiation shows confidence and professionalism.
Even in a tough market, asking respectfully won’t hurt and if an offer is rescinded just for negotiating, it’s likely not a healthy work environment.

Aim for a 10–20% increase based on your research and the role’s market value.

๐Ÿ‘ˆ๐Ÿฝ Follow for real job interview insights.

If you want to stop overthinking your answers and start landing offers…

Get The Interview Answer Playbook for FREE ๐Ÿ‘‡

https://ownerpath.beehiiv.com/subscribe

You’ll learn how to:
• Turn experience into impact
• Remove weak answers
• Make hiring managers feel confident hiring you

Preparation changes outcomes.


Monday, February 23, 2026

During Interview: Sell Me This Pen!

Interviewer: Baik, sebelum kita teruskan… boleh awak jual pen ini kat saya.

Calon: Jual pen?

Interviewer: Ya. Anggap saya customer. Saya taknak pen. Yakinkan saya.

Calon: Boleh saya tahu kenapa saya kena jual pen ini?

Interviewer: Sebab saya suruh. Ni test.

Calon: Ujian untuk nilai apa sebenarnya ya??

Interviewer: Keyakinan. Cara awak meyakinkan orang. Cara awak fikir.

Calon: Kalau macam tu, kenapa pen? Kenapa tak benda yang lebih dekat dengan kerja betul?

Interviewer: Jangan banyak soal. Cuba jual je.

Calon: Baik… tapi sebelum saya jual sesuatu, saya biasanya akan tanya keperluan customer dulu.
Tuan perlukan pen ni untuk apa?

Interviewer: Saya tak perlukan.

Calon: Kalau customer memang tak perlukan, paksa dia beli bukan cara yang baik.

Interviewer: Ni cuma lakonan.

Calon: Lakonan biasanya mencerminkan realiti kerja.
Dalam kerja nanti saya perlu paksa orang beli benda yang diorang tak nak ke?

Interviewer: Awak ni susah sangat ke nak ikut arahan?

Calon: Saya cuma cuba faham.

Interviewer: Ni interview. Kalau tak boleh jual pen, macam mana nak perform?

Calon: Perform sebagai apa sebenarnya?

Interviewer: Sebagai staf di sini.

Calon: Staf…?

Interviewer: …

Calon: Maaf tuan, saya cuma nak pastikan kita bercakap tentang position yang sama.
Saya datang untuk interview cleaner.

Interviewer: ...

Calon: ...

Jordan Belfort's Answer

“The real answer is, before I’m even going to sell a pen to anybody, I need to know about the person, I want to know what their needs are, what kind of pens do they use, do they use a pen? How often do they use a pen? […] The first idea is that […] I want to hear [the salesperson] ask me a question. Most average or newbie salespeople think that they’re supposed to sell you the pen, when a really seasoned salesperson will actually turn it into a qualifying session to find out what you need. That’s the truth of it. It’s like trying to sell someone a house and you don’t know if they’re in the market for a house, what kind of house they want, how many kids – so how can you sell someone a house? That’s the point.” 


Dari RM 1,900 sebulan kepada RM 25,000 sebulan dalam masa 10 tahun

Dari RM 1,900 sebulan kepada RM 25,000 sebulan dalam masa 10 tahun

Post kali ni panjang sikit (macam lah yang lain tak panjang kan ๐Ÿ˜„), sebab nak share pengalaman masa kerja makan gaji dulu — dan apa yang aku buat untuk naikkan pendapatan aku daripada RM 1,900 sebulan masa mula kerja dengan (TNB) sampai RM 25,000 sebulan pada tahun terakhir aku makan gaji (2014).

Majikan Pertama — TNB

Aku dapat biasiswa untuk sambung belajar dekat (MIT). Kalau nak bayar sendiri memang tak mampu. Disebabkan dapat biasiswa TNB, aku kena serve bond.

Masuk TNB melalui Program Eksekutif Pelatih (PEP) batch Mac 2004 (PEP 18). Lepas orientasi, aku ditempatkan di (TNBR) Bangi.

Gaji masa tu: RM 1,900 sebulan. Tiada elaun.

Antara keputusan penting yang aku buat:

1. Minta tukar department daripada R&D ke Strategic Planning & Marketing sebab nampak exposure lebih luas. Tahun pertama dah boleh join management meeting, board session, strategic review dengan top management — peluang yang mungkin tak dapat kalau kekal buat research.
2. Ambil ISO 9001 Internal Auditor — belajar SOP dan teknik audit.
3. Ambil role tambahan sebagai Document Controller — dapat elaun ±25% gaji (tapi kerja memang bertambah).

Aku stay TNBR sampai awal 2007. Gaji terakhir sebelum keluar: RM 2,550.

Majikan Kedua — (PwC)

Aku keluar TNB sebab rezeki tak panjang di sana (kisah ni aku pernah share sebelum ni).

Masa apply kerja, aku target dua arah:

- Engineering (contoh: Alstom)
- Management consulting

PwC offer RM 3,250. Aku nego match offer lain jadi RM 3,500. Mereka siap offer buy-out notice period TNB. Aku accept.

Hari pertama kerja PwC, baru Alstom call nak offer. Tapi aku dah commit dengan PwC.

Dekat PwC aku pilih specialize dalam HR consulting. Masa tu Idris Jala tengah jadi rujukan ramai orang — beliau pernah cerita exposure HR bantu kerjaya beliau sampai jadi CEO. Itu antara inspirasi aku.

Strategi aku dekat PwC:

- Ambil sebanyak mungkin project
- Sebab setiap project = skill baru + klien baru + team baru

Dalam 3 tahun aku terlibat hampir 20 projek (pernah buat 4 projek serentak).

Director aku, Chin Han, pernah bagi nasihat yang aku ingat sampai hari ni:

«Awal kerjaya, fokus pada development, bukan gaji. Anggap kita dibayar untuk belajar. Bila dah ada skill, market akan bayar kita.»

2008: Promotion Assistant Manager
Gaji naik RM 3,500 → RM 5,000
Keluar setahun kemudian dengan gaji ± RM 5,500.

Majikan Ketiga — (EY)

Join sebab:

1. Referral kawan (siap share referral fee ๐Ÿ˜„)
2. Offer Manager + peluang setup HR consulting team

Gaji: RM 7,000

Aku stay 9 bulan sahaja sebab plan setup tu tak jadi seperti dijanjikan dan nak tunggu confirmation untuk dapat referral tu.

Majikan Keempat — (Oman)

Dalam tengah cari kerja, aku dapat peluang project 6 minggu di Oman:

- Bayaran RM 21,000
- Semua kos ditanggung

Aku accept sebab nak test market value diri di luar negara.

Project siap 5 minggu → klien happy → offer kontrak setahun:

- 2,000 OMR (~RM 20,000) sebulan
- Kos rumah & kereta sendiri

Umur masa tu: 29 tahun nak masuk 30.

Ini turning point penting — aku sedar skill yang aku bina memang transferable global.

Majikan Kelima — (TalentCorp)

Dalam proses nak balik Malaysia, aku dapat call dari En Azman untuk jumpa.

Cerita ringkas:
Pergi lunch pakai jeans + selipar. Lepas lunch terus dibawa ke pejabat. Isi borang. 30 minit kemudian jumpa bakal CEO TalentCorp

Beberapa bulan lepas tu:
Offer kontrak 6 bulan:

- Gaji RM 11,200
- EPF 19%
- Company belum wujud lagi masa tu

Aku accept sebab:
Peluang build organisasi dari kosong.

Feb 2011: Diserap sebagai Senior Manager
Gaji: RM 13,000

Setahun kemudian:
GM resign → beliau recommend aku ambil role beliau

Gaji naik ke:
RM 19,000 (probation GM level)

Beberapa tahun kemudian:
Gaji capai RM 25,000 sebulan (2014)

Kalau aku terus makan gaji, masa tu ada offer RM 35,000+.

Apa yang aku belajar daripada perjalanan ni?

1. Career acceleration datang dari exposure, bukan sekadar pengalaman tahun.
2. Awal kerjaya, skill > gaji.
3. Ambil peluang yang orang lain tak nak ambil.
4. Relationship yang baik akan buka pintu rezeki yang kita tak sangka.
5. Bila competence naik, income akan ikut.

Betullah nasihat dulu:

Fokus bina skill dan competency dulu. Duit akan datang kemudian.

Kredit: Rafiq Hidayat Mohd Ramli

Saturday, February 21, 2026

Corporate Lies You Need to Stop Believing Before It’s too Late.

Corporate lies you need to stop believing before it's too late. I'm Yasser, I've spent 15 years in global leadership positions as a global VP. 

Here's the secret truth about corporate. I've watched this play out a thousand times. 

Truth #1, hard work gets you more work. Strategic visibility gets you promoted.

The person who stays late gets another project. The person who speaks up in the exec meeting gets the promotion. 

Truth #2, your manager isn't keeping you because you're irreplaceable.

They're keeping you because you're convenient. The second you become inconvenient, you're gone. Act accordingly.

Truth #3, loyalty is dead. Job hoppers make 30 to 50% more than loyal employees. Your company knows this.

They're banking on you not knowing it. 

Truth #4, we're a family means we expect you to work for less and complain less. Families don't fire you when the budget gets tight.
Companies do!

Truth #5, office politics isn't optional. It's the game.

You're either playing it consciously or you're losing unconsciously. Pick one! 

Truth #6, your yearly review was decided three months ago. That meeting, it's a performance. The decision's already made. 

Truth seven, HR protects the company, not you!

Never forget whose paycheck they're on. Truth eight, we don't have budget means we don't have budget for you. Someone else will get that raise.

It just won't be you. These aren't truths to discourage you. They're truths to wake you up.

The corporate game has rules. Learn them or get played by them.

Send this to yourself as a reminder and follow for more.

It's not Coincidence it's Engineered this way




Thursday, February 19, 2026

Anugerah Perkhidmatan Cemerlang Tapi kena Korek Salah pula Sampai Kena Buang Kerja

Kau hidup berjuang untuk syarikat sungguh-sungguh, ingatkan dapat APC (Anugerah Perkhidmatan Cemerlang), tapi kena korek salah pula sampai kena buang kerj4.

Kita cuba letakkan diri kita sekejap sebagai seorang ibu tunggal kepada tiga orang anak. 

Di bahu kita terpikul beban untuk memastikan ada makanan di atas meja dan bumbung di atas kepala mereka. 

Kita pula masuk kerja hari itu dengan harapan untuk menyelesaikan tugas seperti biasa, tetapi tiba-tiba, rakan sekerja kita berhenti serta-merta.

Pengurus atasan? 

Senyap. Tiada bantuan dihantar.

Kita pula kena sidai sendirian dalam cawangan restoran makanan segera yang memang terkenal dan ramai orang, dari pagi sampai malam selama 12 jam.

Agak-agak, perit tak?
...

Inilah realiti perit yang dilalui oleh Nykia Hamilton, seorang pengurus syif di Burger King di Columbia, Carolina Selatan.

Walaupun berlaku tahun lepas, inilah antara yang sering berlaku pada cawangan-cawangan makanan segera yang popular tapi pekerjanya kurang.

Dan masih ada berlaku, termasuk di Malaysia...
...

Selama syif yang panjang, Nykia bukan sahaja seorang pengurus.

Dia adalah tukang masak yang membalikkan daging di dapur.

Dia adalah juruw4ng yang mengambil pesanan di kaunter. 

Dia adalah suara di corong pandu lalu yang tidak henti-henti berbunyi.

Dia lari ke sana sini, sendirian mengemudi sebuah restoran makanan segera yang sibuk, tanpa sesaat pun untuk menarik nafas lega.

Peluh membasahi dahi, kaki mungkin sudah kebas berdiri, namun dia tetap tersenyum dan melayan pelanggan. 

Mengapa?

Kerana di fikirannya hanya satu...

"Anak-anak aku perlukan pekerjaan ini."
...

Allah itu Maha Adil kepada semua manusia sama ada Muslim mahupun tidak.

Dia menghantar "saksi", iaitu seorang pelanggan ke dalam cawangan Nykia bekerja itu

Pelanggan bernama Nicole Struggle itu, yang berada di sana tergamam melihat kegigihan wanita ini. 

Nicole merakam video Nykia yang sedang bertungkus-lumus sendirian, bukan untuk memalukan, tetapi kerana kagum dengan etika kerja luar biasa wanita ini.

"Tengok wanita ini, dia buat semuanya seorang diri. Tiada sesiapa lain di sini,"..

Lebih kurang begitulah naratif yang tersebar apabila video itu dimuat naik ke media sosial.

Dunia tersentuh. 

Netizen dari seluruh pelosok dunia memuji ketabahan Nykia. Dia digelar "hero pekerja", simbol dedikasi seorang ibu yang sanggup melakukan apa sahaja demi keluarga.

Sebab, bukan senang nak kerj4 dalam industri makanan segera. Orang nak cepat, pelanggan nak laju.

Kalau kita temp4h di kaunter pandu lalu pun, tak ada orang tanya kita nak pesan apa, tentu-tentu kita dah rasa geram dan berasap.

Lama tunggu pesanan, lagilah mulut kadang-kala ringan aja nak maki staf yang uruskan.

Satu industri yang penuh dengan tekanan melibatkan kompetensi dalam menyediakan makanan yang laju, efisien dan tentulah sedap.
...

Namun, pujian dunia maya kepada Nykia, tidaklah senada dengan tindakan majikan di dunia nyata.

Tidak lama selepas video itu tular, dan memaparkan realiti sebenar pengurusan restoran tersebut, Nykia menerima khabar yang meremukkan hati.

Daripada diberi penghargaan atas pentas atau kenaikan pangkat ke lebih atas, dia dipecat.

Alasan mereka? 

"Isu kehadiran." 

Pihak pengurusan mendakwa Nykia kerap datang lewat.

Nykia tidak menafikannya. 

Sebagai ibu tunggal yang berpendapatan rendah, dia tidak mampu mengupah pengasuh.

Kerapkali dia datang lewat adalah kerana menguruskan anak-anaknya dahulu dan barulah datang ke tempat kerja.

Nykia menegaskan...

"Anak-anak saya adalah keutamaan saya."

Tetapi bagi orang ramai, alasan 'kehadiran yang kerap lewat' itu hanyalah helah. 

Ia kelihatan seperti hukuman kerana "membuka pekung" syarikat secara tidak sengaja.

Kecaman dan kutukan pada syarikat yang membuang Nykia terus menerus disajikan di media sosial.

Bagaimana mungkin seseorang yang sanggup bekerja 12 jam tanpa henti sendirian, dibuang begitu sahaja?
...

Rezeki Tak Pernah Salah Alamat

Di saat pintu rezeki Burger King tertutup, pintu rahmat lain terbuka luas dengan cara yang tidak disangka-sangka.

Kemarahan netizen bertukar menjadi gelombang kasih sayang. Satu tabung GoFundMe dilancarkan untuk Nykia.

Orang ramai yang tidak pernah menemuinya, yang hanya melihat ketabahannya melalui skrin telefon, mula menyumbang. 

10 dolvr
50 dolvr
100 dolvr

Dalam masa yang singkat, jumlah sumbangan mencecah lebih 120,000 dolvr.

Nykia, yang asalnya hanya mahu mencari rezeki halal untuk anak-anaknya, kini mempunyai modal untuk memulakan hidup baru yang lebih stabil, jauh daripada majikan yang tidak menghargai titik peluhnya.

Kisah Nykia Hamilton bukan sekadar cerita tentang Burger King.

Ia adalah cermin kepada realiti pekerja bawahan yang sering ditindas, dan bukti bahawa apabila sistem gagal melindungi kita, kuasa kemanusiaan dan solidariti masyarakat mampu menjadi penyelamat.

Seperti kata orang tua-tua kita dulu, "Buat baik dibalas baik." 

Nykia buat kerja dengan ikhlas walau ditindas, dan akhirnya, Tuhan mengangkat darjatnya di mata dunia.

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

How to Ask for a Pay Rise at Work

If you walk into a meeting and say, I want a 20% pay rise, you've already weakened your position.


My name's Lee and I've worked in talent acquisition for over 20 years. I've seen pay conversations from both sides, and most people get this wrong because they turn it into a demand.

They say,
  I've been here two years. Everything's more expensive. I work really hard.
I check the market
 and I'm underpaid. Here's the problem. You've just forced your manager into a yes or no decision.

That triggers defensiveness. A pay rise isn't a reward for effort. It's a business investment.

So here's how you do it properly. First, anchor to impact. What have you delivered in the last 6-12 months? Revenue generated.
Costs saved. Projects delivered. Problem solved.
Be specific.
 Numbers win. Second, know your market value.

If you don't know the salary range for your role,
 level and location, you're negotiating blind. Third, frame it as progression, not a demand. Instead of, I want a pay rise.

Say, over the past year I've delivered X, Y and Z.
 Based on current market benchmarks, roles at this level sit around X and Y. I'm committed to continuing to grow here. What would I need to demonstrate to move to that figure within the next 6 months? Now you've done three important things. You've shown value.

You've shown commercial
 awareness. And you've opened a conversation. If they say yes, great.

If they say no, you've asked
 for a roadmap. And if they can't give you one, that tells you something about your long-term prospects there. Salary conversations aren't emotional.
They're commercial. Approach them 
like an adult and you'll dramatically increase your chances. For more no-nonsense career advice, hit the follow button.